🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “utter hypocrisy” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

A letter obtained by media originating from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the African officials asks for proposals to prohibit tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting changes to a draft bill that include reductions in the recommended coverage of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavoured tobacco products, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Activist commentary

“If I was a politician, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” commented Master Chimbala.

Over seven thousand citizens a year succumb to tobacco-related illnesses, according to global health agency statistics.

The advocate mentioned the letter was believed to have been distributed to various ministerial offices and was in distribution within community advocacy networks.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. Last month, WHO officials raised concerns that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of industry lobbying everywhere. Manufacturer hallmarks are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN summit conference,” commented Jorge Alday.

Possible outcomes

“When public health regulation isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in lives of people who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that pictorial cautions cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Via documentation, BAT suggests this be decreased to less than half “within the WHO-FCTC guideline limits”, deferred for no less than twelve months after the bill passes.

The WHO in fact recommends a caution must occupy at least 50% of the cigarette package face “and aim to cover as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Within Britain, warnings need to encompass sixty-five percent of a packet’s front and back.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the removal of broad restrictions on flavored cigarette varieties, suggesting that it would drive users to “black market” products. The company proposes banning a limited selection of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for multiple violations “varying from a fraction of annual sales to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Company justification

Through correspondence, the managing director of the Zambian branch says the firm is “committed to good corporate behaviour” and “endorses the aims of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the related medical consequences” but claims that “some regulations can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Critic response

The advocate stated the company's suggested modifications would “weaken this legislation so much that the required influence for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that multiple comparable regulations operated within the UK, where the corporation is based, was “total double standard”, he said.

“We exist in a global village. When I cultivate smoking products in my garden and gather the crop and market the products – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to enrich myself and all the future family lines while my neighbor's family are dying … is in itself total emotional failure.”

Tobacco control legislation in the Britain or other nations had not resulted in corporate closures, the campaigner stated. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Official corporate statement

The corporate communicator said: “The company operates its business in compliance with relevant national regulations. Further, the firm contributes in the state's regulatory development in line with the suitable systems which provide for stakeholder participation in policymaking.”

The corporation remained “not against rules”, the representative commented, noting that underage people should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion progressive regulation to accomplish desired population health targets, while accepting the variety of rights and obligations on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the spokesperson stated, adding that the corporation's recommendations “represent the situation of the local commercial environment and smoking product business, which includes growing volumes of illegal commerce”.

The country's office of trade, commerce and industry was contacted for response.